Prepping for a Cisco cert like CCNA, CCNP, or CCIE? You know it takes more than just book smarts. You need hands-on lab time to really nail the real-world stuff. If you don't have racks of physical gear lying around (who does?), network simulators and emulators are your best bet for practicing Cisco labs virtually.
This article breaks down five popular options to help you get ready for your Cisco exams.
Here's a fast look at common tools, what they're good for, and the cost factor. Keep in mind, "free" tools often need more setup effort or your own OS images.
Tool |
Good For |
Cost |
Platform |
Best Use |
---|---|---|---|---|
Packet Tracer |
Beginners |
Free |
All |
CCNA simulation, learning basics |
GNS3 |
Intermediate+ |
Free |
All |
CCNP/CCIE emulation |
Cisco CML-P |
Advanced users |
Paid |
All |
Realistic modeling |
EVE-NG |
Expert users |
Free/Paid |
Web-based |
Complex labs, multi-vendor |
Boson NetSim |
CCNA/CCNP |
Paid |
Windows Only |
Structured labs, exam practice |
CloudMyLab |
All levels |
Pay-as-you-go |
Cloud-based |
Hosted GNS3/EVE/CML, no hardware needed |
The right tool often depends on which exam you're gunning for. As you move up from CCNA to CCIE, the labs get way more complex, often needing serious hardware or a cloud-based solution.
Exam Level |
Primary Tool(s) |
Other Things to Consider |
CCNA |
Cisco Packet Tracer |
Boson NetSim offers structured, exam-focused labs (paid). CloudMyLab lets you start small and scale up later without hardware worries. |
CCNP |
GNS3 / EVE-NG (Community or Pro)
|
Recommended: CloudMyLab's hosted options are great for avoiding hardware headaches with complex labs. Cisco CML-P is very realistic (also hostable via CloudMyLab). |
CCIE |
Cisco CML-P / EVE-NG Professional |
Highly Recommended: CloudMyLab hosted emulators remove hardware limits for massive CCIE labs and include support. |
These are software tools that let you build and test virtual networks without buying actual hardware. You can spin up virtual routers, switches, firewalls, etc., in a safe sandbox environment. For Cisco prep, they give you crucial hands-on time with Cisco IOS/NX-OS commands right on your computer.
Using them is usually cheaper than buying real gear, flexible (practice whenever!), provides realistic config practice, and scales from basic labs to complex scenarios.
It helps to know the lingo:
Let's look closer at our top choices:
Best For: Beginners & CCNA students
Runs On: Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS
Cost: Free (requires free Cisco NetAcad account)
Packet Tracer is Cisco's own tool, built mainly for Networking Academy students. It uses a simple drag-and-drop interface and has a simulation mode where you can actually watch packets move through the network – pretty neat for understanding the basics.
It simulates common Cisco routers and switches, PCs, and even some IoT stuff. It's easy to use, free, and works on most devices. Perfect for getting your feet wet with CCNA topics.
The Catch: It simulates, it doesn't emulate. This means some advanced features or protocols might be simplified or missing entirely (e.g., limited BGP, no real Layer 3 switching). It's not suitable for CCNP or CCIE labs.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Cisco Packet Tracer & Reddit community real-world perspectives
The consensus among Reddit users is that Packet Tracer serves as an excellent entry point for CCNA studies. One r/ccna user summarizes the common sentiment: "Packet Tracer is perfect for beginners, completely free with a Cisco Networking Academy account, and covers most CCNA topics adequately."
However, limitations become immediately apparent for advanced certifications. A network engineer on r/networking notes, "Once you start diving into CCNP protocols, Packet Tracer quickly shows its limitations—it's designed as a learning tool, not a full-fledged emulator."
Best for: Intermediate to Advanced learners (CCNP, CCIE)
Runs On: Windows, macOS, Linux
Cost: Free (Open Source)
GNS3 is a powerful emulator. It runs real Cisco IOS/NX-OS images (and others like Juniper Junos, Palo Alto PAN-OS), giving you a much more authentic lab experience. You can easily connect your GNS3 labs to tools like Wireshark for deep packet inspection.
It's great for CCNP and CCIE prep because it behaves like real gear. You get realistic practice without needing physical hardware, and there's a huge online community for support and pre-built labs.
The Catch: You have to legally obtain the OS images yourself (e.g., from Cisco CML licenses, VIRL, or service contracts). It needs more RAM and CPU than Packet Tracer, and the setup can be a bit more involved initially.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
GNS3 & Reddit community real-world perspectives
GNS3 receives strong praise for its flexibility and longevity in the community. A 10-year veteran on Reddit on r/ccnp explains their loyalty: "I use GNS3 simply because it's what I've been using for 10+ years now and have had no reason to change. All of my images are still there, every topology I built over the years is still there."
The platform's ability to integrate with third-party tools is frequently cited as a major advantage. "GNS3 allowed me to integrate with Wireshark seamlessly for packet analysis, which was crucial for my CCNP studies," mentions another user.
However, the setup complexity is a recurring complaint: "The initial configuration can be painful compared to alternatives," notes one r/networking contributor.
Best for: CCNP, CCIE candidates, Network Pros
Runs On: Windows, macOS, Linux
Cost: Paid (annual subscription)
Previously known as VIRL, CML-P is Cisco’s premium simulator for professionals. It comes bundled with licensed Cisco OS images (IOS, NX-OS, IOS XR, etc.), so you don't need to hunt them down separately. It's designed for accurately modeling and testing real-world networks, making it a solid choice for CCNP and CCIE prep.
The Catch: It costs money annually. The node limits might be restrictive for massive CCIE labs on the lower tier. It requires a fairly beefy machine to run well locally.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Cisco Modeling Labs & Reddit community real-world perspectives
CML receives mixed feedback, with many acknowledging its accuracy while questioning its value proposition. A Reddit thread on r/ccnp titled "Which one do you prefer? CML, GNS3, EVE-NG" reveals divided opinions, with one user noting: "I have been using CML on Devnet time to time and I gotta say that there is something that I really don't like. For some damn reason, I can't get it to work properly with external connectivity."
However, CML's authenticity is unquestioned. "CML provides the most accurate Cisco environment since it's literally running the same software as the physical devices," confirms a CCIE holder.
The licensing cost remains the primary barrier, with a Reddit user summarizing: "CML is great if you can afford it or your company pays for it, but hard to justify the expense for individual study when alternatives exist."
Best for: Advanced learners, CCNP/CCIE candidates
Runs On: Windows, macOS, Linux (usually run as a VM, accessed via web browser)
Cost: Free (Community), Paid (Pro version)
EVE-NG is another professional-grade emulator that's hugely popular, especially among CCIE candidates. It supports Cisco and many other vendors (Juniper, Palo Alto, Fortinet, F5, etc.). It runs as a Linux VM, and you access your labs through a web browser, which many find convenient.
EVE-NG is available in two editions: Community and Professional. The Community Edition is free to use but comes with certain limitations compared to the paid Professional Edition. The Pro version adds features like hot-adding links, lab timers, and more simultaneous users.
It can handle very large, complex topologies needed for CCIE labs (especially the Pro version). Its multi-vendor support is a big plus.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
EVE-NG & Reddit community real-world perspectives
EVE-NG has gained significant traction in recent years, with many users switching from GNS3. A popular Reddit post on r/ccnp titled "If you're using GNS3, switch to EVE-NG" gathered substantial agreement, with the author explaining: "I was a hardcore GNS3 user... However, I just got EVE-NG running and I'm blown away by how much better it is."
The web interface receives particular praise, as one r/networking user states: "EVE-NG is far superior in my opinion to GNS3 if you're sharing use of it among a team. It's a simple web interface with nothing to really install on your computer."
Community members consistently highlight EVE-NG's stability for complex topologies. "With EVE-NG, I haven't experienced the random crashes I used to get with GNS3 when building large enterprise networks," reports one CCIE candidate.
Best for: CCNA and CCNP learners
Runs On: Windows
Cost: Paid
Boson NetSim is a premium simulator specifically designed for Cisco exam prep. Its biggest strength is the library of pre-built, structured labs that align directly with CCNA and CCNP ENCOR exam topics. The command-line interface feels very close to real Cisco IOS.
It's great if you want guided practice directly tied to exam objectives.
The Catch: It's paid software. It simulates, so it has limitations compared to emulators for deep dives or off-script experimentation. It's Windows-only. Less flexible for building custom topologies compared to GNS3/EVE-NG/CML.
Key Features:
Pros:
Cons:
Boson NetSim & Reddit community real-world perspectives
While less frequently discussed on Reddit compared to other options, Boson NetSim users value its certification-focused approach. "Boson's labs are directly aligned with exam objectives, which saved me considerable time when preparing for my CCNA," shares one successful candidate.
Another user appreciates the structured approach: "NetSim forces you to understand the 'why' behind configurations rather than just copying commands."
Read more:
One of the recurring challenges across emulators is the high local resource requirement. CloudMyLab solves this by hosting GNS3, EVE-NG, or CML on enterprise-grade cloud infrastructure.
With CloudMyLab, you don't need a beastly local machine. You get:
CloudMyLab’s Hosted Solutions & Reddit community real-world perspectives
A notable trend emerging across recent discussions is the shift toward hosted solutions. As one r/networking user explains: "Running these emulators locally requires significant resources. I've switched to using CloudMyLab's hosted environment for my EVE-NG labs, which means I can access everything from my laptop without melting it."
This sentiment is echoed in a rack rental review thread where a user mentions: "Having a cloud-hosted lab environment removes all the hardware headaches and lets me focus on actually learning."
Honestly? There's no single "best" one. It truly depends on where you are in your certification journey and your budget/resources.
Below is the detailed comparison but the TLDR is:
Feature |
CloudMyLab |
Packet Tracer |
GNS3 |
CML |
EVE-NG |
Boson NetSim |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type |
Hosted Emulator / Cloud-based simulation service |
Simulator |
Emulator |
Emulator |
Emulator |
Simulator |
Cost |
Pay-as-you-go (starting at ~$0.04/hour, usage-based pricing) |
Free |
Free |
Paid ($199–$349/year) |
Free (Community) / Paid ($110/year) |
Paid (~$179/year) |
Real IOS Support |
Yes (supports real IOS when running CML 2.0 or integrated platforms) |
No |
Yes (requires IOS) |
Yes |
Yes (when configured) |
No |
Resource Requirements |
Minimal local requirements (fully managed cloud resources) |
Low |
Moderate |
High |
High |
Low |
Best for CCNA |
Excellent (provides scalable access to multiple lab types) |
Excellent (fundamental labs) |
Good |
Good |
Good |
Excellent |
Best for CCNP |
Excellent (allows advanced simulations without hardware limits) |
Limited |
Excellent |
Excellent |
Excellent |
Good |
Best for CCIE |
Excellent (enterprise-grade, high-fidelity simulations on-demand) |
Inadequate |
Good |
Excellent |
Excellent |
Limited |
Interface |
Web-based dashboard and control panels |
Graphical (desktop app) |
Graphical |
Graphical |
Web-based |
Graphical |
Setup Complexity |
Very low (cloud-hosted and fully managed by CloudMyLab) |
Low (simple installation) |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Low |
Multi-vendor Support |
Excellent (by integrating multiple simulation platforms) |
Limited |
Yes |
Limited |
Yes |
No |
The verdict is clear from professionals across the networking community: there's no single "best" simulator for Cisco exams. As one experienced network engineer on r/ccnp perfectly summed it up: "The best simulator is the one that fits your learning style, budget, and specific certification goals. I've used all three (GNS3, EVE-NG, CML) at different points in my career, and they all have their place."
What stands out in recent discussions is the growing shift toward hosted lab environments. The days of struggling with resource-intensive local installations, hunting down compatible images, and troubleshooting configuration issues are becoming optional rather than mandatory. This trend reflects a maturing industry where professionals increasingly value their time and focus on skill development rather than infrastructure management.
Where do you go from here? Consider these strategic next steps:
Ready to start labbing without the headaches? Visit CloudMyLab to see our range of hosted lab environments and training resources Questions? Our team is standing by at support@cloudmylab.com or via live chat on our website
Looking for structured, intensive training?
Cisco ACI Bootcamp: Deep dive into SDN with real ACI fabric labs. Check out our Cisco ACI Bootcamp
SD-WAN: Get practical SD-WAN skills in dedicated lab environments.
CCIE Security: The CCIE Security lab mirrors modern security hurdles, using Cisco's current security gear. Our guide breaks down the lab's layout, the gear involved (physical and virtual), the security zones, and how to approach implementing solutions within this environment.
Cisco Packet Tracer is the most popular and best-suited simulator for CCNA beginners. However, if you're looking for a solution that can grow with you beyond CCNA, CloudMyLab's hosted environments offer Packet Tracer-like simplicity with the ability to scale as your certification journey advances.
Yes! GNS3 supports real IOS images and is great for CCIE-level labs. Many CCIE candidates prefer using CloudMyLab's hosted GNS3 solution to avoid the heavy resource requirements that complex CCIE topologies demand from local machines.
It’s good for understanding basic concepts, but pairing it with theoretical study is essential.
Simulators mimic behavior without using real OS, while emulators use real images (like GNS3 and EVE-NG). Emulators provide more accurate representations of real-world environments but typically require more resources—a constraint that hosted solutions like CloudMyLab effectively eliminate.
You need a powerful PC/laptop (at least 8–16GB RAM and multi-core CPU). This is one of the primary reasons many professionals choose CloudMyLab's hosted solutions—they eliminate hardware constraints entirely, allowing you to run complex labs even from basic laptops.
Yes, you can deploy EVE-NG on cloud platforms like GCP or AWS, though this requires cloud engineering knowledge. For a turnkey solution, CloudMyLab provides fully managed EVE-NG environments with 24/7 support and no cloud configuration required.
No, Cisco CML requires a subscription even for personal use.
Yes, GNS3 and EVE-NG support third-party firewall images like Palo Alto, Fortinet, etc. CloudMyLab's hosted environments come pre-configured with a wide range of security appliance images, saving you the trouble of sourcing and configuring them yourself.
Yes, the CCNA exam includes simulation questions where you must configure or troubleshoot networks in a simulated environment. These are designed to test your practical skills, not just theoretical knowledge. Practicing with tools like Packet Tracer or GNS3 is essential for preparing for these simulation questions.
It depends on your needs. GNS3 is more powerful and realistic since it runs actual IOS images, making it better for advanced studies (CCNP/CCIE). Packet Tracer is easier to use, requires fewer resources, and is sufficient for CCNA preparation. Many professionals start with Packet Tracer and graduate to GNS3 as they advance.
Reddit discussions in communities like r/ccna, r/ccnp, and r/networking show varied preferences based on certification level. Often Packet Tracer for CCNA, then GNS3 or EVE-NG for CCNP/CCIE are mentioned. You'll also see increasing mentions of hosted labs like CloudMyLab to avoid the local hardware limitations of emulators.